
The federal government’s anti-pollution detectives have lost their focus, 
allege government watchdog group Public Employees for Environmental 
Responsibility.
According to documents obtained by PEER under the Freedom of Information Act, 
the Environmental Protection Agency’s investigation unit is understaffed and 
referring fewer cases for federal prosecution than during the Bush 
administration.
“We’ve been contacted by special agents in the EPA’s Criminal Investigation 
Division saying they feel that the program is headed in the wrong direction,” 
said PEER executive director Jeff Ruch.
PEER’s announcement, which came days before the 40th anniversary of the EPA’s 
Clean Air Act, is the latest in a series of CID controversies.
During the Bush administration, when the EPA at large was under political 
pressure to skew many of its scientific decisions in favor of industry, CID 
investigators were assigned such environmentally-unrelated activities as providing 
security at Super Bowls and all-star games.
Rather than pursuing corporate wrongdoers, some of the agency’s elite, 
badge-carrying agents became personal errand-runners for then-EPA chief Christie 
Todd Whitman, who used them to pick up laundry and walk 
her dogs.
Backlash sparked by attention from PEER and other activists prompted review, 
and the EPA under President Obama has — despite concerns over chief Lisa 
Jackson’s industry 
ties and prior pollution enforcement record — been far truer to its 
mission.
But according to PEER, much work remains to be done.
“The overall point that agents are bringing to us is that the management of 
CID has lost focus on environmental prosecution as the purpose of the program,” 
said Ruch. “Things are adrift.”
Employment records released by the EPA to PEER show that in June, there were 
just 173 
CID investigators (pdf), well below the 200 required by the U.S. Pollution 
Protection Act of 1990 and fewer than the 180 investigators employed at the end 
of the Bush administration.
“You’d think that to the extent you’re going to do more enforcement, having 
more inestigators would be a good idea,” said Ruch.
According to an EPA statement relayed by agency spokesperon Stacy Kika, those 
numbers were accurate when sent to PEER in June but no longer apply. “With 
recent hires, EPA currently has 192 agents in its Criminal Investigative 
Division and another 20 in the pipeline,” said the EPA.
PEER’s documents also show that CID referred only 339 
cases for federal prosecution (pdf) in 2009, well below the Bush 
administration average of 365 cases per year. The agency doesn’t conduct 
prosecutions itself, but suggests candidates for legal action to the Department 
of Justice.
The EPA replied that it had opened 387 cases in 2009, the highest number in 
five years. But Ruch said that cases referred are a far more meaningful 
number.
“Opening a case just means that you’ve started an investigation, which may or 
may not be concluded, which may or may not be referred for prosecution,” he 
said. “We’re focusing on the number of cases that EPA took to the Justice 
Department and said, ‘You should prosecute.’”
Stated the agency, “Special agents are carefully allocating our finite 
resources by going after the biggest, most serious offenders.”
PEER will deliver further critiques of CID in coming months, said Ruch.
“What we’re hearing, on an anecdotal basis, is that a lot of the focus is on 
bureaucratic minutiae, at the expense of putting polluters in jail,” he 
said.
Image: Chemical waste on a beach in Lake Charles, Louisiana photographed 
in 1972 by Marc St. 
Gil as part of the EPA’s Documerica 
project. 
See Also:
- The ’70s 
Photos That Made Us Want to Save Earth
 - Obama’s Most 
Important Science Decision: Picking EPA Head
 - EPA 
Reverses Controversial ‘Human Guinea Pig’ Rule
 - EPA 
Chief Cooked Books on California Clean Car Decision 
Brandon Keim’s Twitter stream and reportorial outtakes; Wired Science on Twitter. Brandon is currently working 
on an ecological tipping point 
project.

No comments:
Post a Comment